Originalism Does Not Need a Makeover



ewsweek opinion editor Josh Hammer argues at Public Discourse that conservatives should replace originalism with a new, refined judicial philosophy named “common-good originalism.” Hammer is a sharp guy, and one assumes that his is the best argument that could be made for this proposal. His argument is, however, unspecific in its critiques, vague in its proposals, unmoored from constitutional legitimacy, and unsound as strategy. That suggests that the problem is not the messenger, but the message.

Briefly defined, originalism is the idea that when a law is passed, it means what it is understood to mean at the time it receives …

Articles You May Like

Your Weekly Good News Round-Up: Headache Relief, Baby Animals, and Deep Space
Border agents stop, arrest two Yemeni men on FBI terror watch list
Gun rights advocates raise alarm over Biden ATF pick, who was agent involved in Waco massacre case
“Antiracist” Boston doctors say white patients should be left untreated to die, while black patients go to the front of the line
Arkansas Governor: Social conservatives ‘don’t need to use the instrument of the law’ to change the culture

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *